Shoot Me Straight: Is Biden Wrecking Energy Markets?

By: Chris Amstutz

We regret to inform you; the politicians are back at it again. We have commented on politics in energy numerous times in the past, and today we look to address the volley of energy headlines that have come out in recent weeks. Like every topic, there is nuance and gray area that is difficult to explain to those outside the energy industry. Today we start a new blog series to address ongoing questions from popular headlines in the industry. GETCHOICE! has decades of combined energy experience, and like a cowboy in the wild west of the energy industry, we always shoot you straight. Here are some of the recent headlines with additional nuance discussed.

Will Biden’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Release Lower Gasoline Prices?

This article reports that the White House predicts gasoline prices to fall 10-30 cents per gallon on the announcement that 180 million barrels of oil would be released for U.S. consumption. SPR releases have had mixed results in the past and it is difficult to say what the final outcome for this will be. The visible outcome thus far, is that the market has lowered WTI oil price futures for the next 6 months, but increased prices beyond that point (see chart below). This is due to producers adapting their production outputs lower in the long run due to lower profit margins in the short run. So all in all, the more complicated answer is that politicians can marginally adjust oil and natural gas prices in the short run but these policies have rippling, unintended consequences in the future. Upward price movements, like what we have seen in the last 6 months, ultimately are tied to long term fundamentals of supply and demand against the back drop of industry trends.

Has the U.S. given up on the Green Energy transition?

This article discusses the “reluctance of President Biden to unleash clean energy rhetoric”. Green energy topics do not typically poll well when energy prices are high (hence the President’s reluctance), but many U.S. and European politicians believe that high prices are the catalyst to increasing renewable energy sources on the grid. The reality is that the U.S. is still not close to a macro, nationwide green future due to the sheer scale in technology required to change the current system. However, micro, individual business level green-initiatives are becoming more popular due to the ability to save money on utilities. GETCHOICE!’s utility bill management  platform GET: Smart Management Technology (formerly Choice! Data Connect), allows businesses to benchmark usage, track Scope 2 & 3 carbon emissions, and quantify savings from these green initiatives at the site level. This trend will grow due to high energy prices and the need for increased cost efficiencies.

Are Oil, Natural Gas, and Electricity Prices Increasing Because of Vladimir Putin?

The White House recently published this fact sheet, addressing “Putin’s price hike at the pump”. While it is easy and convenient to blame high energy prices on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it is but a small factor in the energy market price increase, and should not be used as a meaningful procurement strategy. The truth is, oil, natural gas, and electricity prices began rising in the summer of 2021 to now (up over 100% year over year), due to chronic underinvestment in the energy industry. COVID-19 lockdowns destroyed demand for hydrocarbons, leading to some of the biggest financial losses in the history of American petroleum. The White House now claims that these same companies are gouging Americans, ignoring the need for producers to show a financial return to investors who also lost heavily in 2020-2021. This, coupled with policies that have inhibited domestic pipeline growth and drilling, has added to the global energy shortages we see today. In all reality, Vladimir Putin likely sees the global energy shortage and lack of energy security as an opportunity to advance Russia’s interests in Ukraine, knowing that Europe has no other choice than to buy their petroleum.

The path forward for energy prices is unclear. The answer to the blog question is that President Biden has only a limited capability to affect energy prices in the short run, but the effects of policies today could shape prices two years from now. In the same right, President Biden cannot be blamed fully for today’s energy prices, which were set in to motion during the height of COVID-19. Government directed policy has a tendency to cause the opposite of what is intended in an industry as complex as energy. The facts remain that the globe has felt the effects of an energy shortage since last summer and it will likely continue to be felt for another year as the market stabilizes. The current administration has vocally opposed the use of hydrocarbons, but is quickly realizing the damaging economic effects of a world without them. GETCHOICE! continues to monitor the news closely, looking out for our client’s financial well being during these times of high energy prices.

ERCOT Disaster: MythBusters

By: Chris Amstutz

The winter storm of the century in the energy capital of the world has frozen all preconceived notions of the Electric “Reliability” Council of Texas. As the snow melts and the plumbing repairs begin, the analysts at Choice! Energy Management find solace in aiding Texans through these difficult times. With any natural disaster, people want answers and to know how their interests will be protected in the future. This has given way to the blame game and many myths about the Texas power market. To help address these questions we look back to the long running, scientific TV series MythBusters. The causes of the ERCOT disaster are innumerable and it is with an open mind that we dissect the situation.

Myth (noun): A widely held belief not factually proven; an exaggerated or idealized conception.

Myth #1: “ERCOT should have been able to prevent the power outages with the 7 day notice they had of the impending weather event.”

Answer: Busted

This disaster has shown the weaknesses of the ERCOT grid, especially in the winter. Generation assets in Texas did not have the infrastructure upgrades to prevent malfunction during the cold, known as winterization, and this is likely the main reason for failure last week. Winterization was an expense spared by generators since a deep freeze does not occur often, helping Texans to enjoy lower power prices. Like the Titanic heading for the Iceberg (see the MythBusters confirm that Jack could’ve survived with Rose here), the 7 day forecast was not enough time to prepare the grid.  ERCOT operates under the assumption of a ten-year normal winter (which will certainly change now), and this event was likely a one-hundred-year event.

Myth #2: “One single energy generation source (renewable, fossil fuel, or nuclear) was to blame for the blackouts.”

Answer: Busted

This popular political talking point (everything is political these days), has been thrown around a lot. To this we point to the graphic below. Yes, the wind turbines were frozen and yes, natural gas and coal did have the largest absolute decreases in generation available, but pointing to half the truth is not the truth. In all reality, the frozen precipitation had huge impacts on every generation source. From pre-freeze levels, it is estimated that natural gas lost 15-20 Gigawatts (GW’s) of generation, not including the 15 GW’s that were offline for seasonal maintenance. Wind Generation fell from 5-10 GW’s pre-freeze to 1-2 GW’s during. Coal lost 6 GW’s during the freeze, and even the incredibly steady nuclear baseload lost 25% (1.3 GW’s) due to the fear of insufficient water supplies. Future ERCOT conversations will now involve adequate winterization, and a repricing of all assets not protected from winter weather and sufficient reliability.

Myth #3: “This was a black swan weather event so the chances that prices get this crazy again are tiny.”

Answer: Busted

A black swan event is defined as something “unpredictable” but this weather event has occurred before in ERCOT. The Christmas cold of 1989 was the most similar event to this, with colder absolute temperatures but not lasting as long. The grid also came close to blackouts in the 2011 cold event. When you also look at demand side issues, like the fact that Texas has added 1.5 million homes since 2011 (the most of any state by 600k homes), and 62% of these homes require electricity for heating, it compounds the issue. We have discussed power market volatility in our past blogs here, here, and here. With less reliable, non-winterized generation on the grid, ERCOT will remain susceptible to price spikes, and higher futures prices will be needed to steady the market.

Myth #4: “Forces outside of Texas wanted the blackouts to occur, and sabotaged Texans in some form.”

Answer: Busted

While not a widespread myth we have seen this claim thrown around. There is no reason to believe at this time that willful negligence or any other human induced action in the short time leading up to and during the event caused the power outages. From fake snow conspiracies (see here), to rumors of Department of Energy sabotages, there has not been any evidence of at this time. It is true that several members of the ERCOT board (including the now former chairman) reside out of state, but as of today all of these members have resigned due to criticism.

The last two weeks have certainly been difficult. Consumers are very much justified in demanding that reliability of the grid is prioritized to prevent an event like this from happening again. However, everyone is quick to forget the enormous amount of savings the ERCOT market structure has provided Texas in past years. The critics of the free-market ERCOT system are now louder than ever, and the future of this system is unknown. Opportunity will favor the informed, as the implications shake out from this event. The analysts at Choice! Energy Management take pride in helping our clients prepare, and look forward to helping more Texans navigate this ever-changing energy world.