Everyone Is an Energy Expert… So They Think

By: Matthew Mattingly

123

Everyone seems to have strong opinions on the high energy prices impacting our country (and the rest of the world).  Record high prices at the pump, coinciding with historically high prices for all fossil fuels have more people talking about energy supply and demand than I can ever remember. I’ve worked in the industry for over 15 years, but now can’t escape the conversation at a cookout, grocery store, or even my kid’s baseball games. I’ve heard it all; from blaming it all on Biden, to “Big Oil” price gauging (remember they make more money than God himself). Unfortunately, all of this conversation has allowed a lot of incorrect information and misleading data to be spread. The intel is often provided by extremely intelligent people. However, with countless market fundamentals to follow and technical trading patterns to evaluate, it’s difficult for those outside the industry to get the full picture of the energy landscape. Today we will discuss and respond to some of the bad energy takes from Twitter we have recently seen by two sports radio hosts from opposite sides of the political aisle.

123

Twitter Name/Handle, Example 1:  Matt Jones (@kysportsradio)

Background:  Best known as sports radio host and founder of Kentucky Sports Radio. Matt Jones is unlike the customary sports talk jock. His credentials include: being a graduate from Duke University School of Law, authoring a NY Times Best Seller, Mitch, Please!, and an interest in running for US Senate against Mitch McConnell. I personally follow Matt Jones on Twitter because of my love of University of Kentucky athletics and other daily evaluations living in my home state of Kentucky.  

Matt Jones’ Twitter Page

Matt Jones’ Tweet: “But I don’t think there is anything our government can do about it (high gasoline prices). We are totally dependent on Foreign Oil.”

Unless you count Mexico and Canada as “foreign oil”, the U.S. is not totally dependent. The U.S. is the largest oil producer in the world and the gap widens when you include all petroleum products (propane, ethane, gasoline, natural gas, etc). The U.S. gained that title in 2018, and oil production peaked in 2019 at 12.25 million barrels per day.  While the U.S. does receive crude oil imports, 72% of it comes from North American countries.  In the context of talking about Russia and OPEC for our government’s energy policy, we are not dependent upon their oil. Taking it one step further, reducing regulations and bureaucracy in the U.S. would bring more drilling & refineries that would lessen our ties to global prices. There absolutely is something our government could have done and still can do to prevent high energy prices.

123

Matt Jones’ Tweet: “Most individual consumption (oil) come from overseas. We save most of the domestic (oil) for industrial needs.” 

This tweet appears to be contradictory. The crude oil market consists of numerous grades of crude oil that vary by weight and sulfur content. Crude with lower sulfur is referred to as sweet, while higher sulfur content is considered sour. The U.S. oil reserves typically produces light-sweet crude oil, which can go to any refinery, and is used mostly for gasoline. While sour crudes (imported from Canada, Russia, and others) produce heavier distillate products, such as diesel and jet fuel, which would be used more for industrial needs. There has not been a refinery built in the U.S. since the 1970’s and many of these refineries are built to take in sour crude. However, the categories on how we can use this oil are not as defined as what the tweet leads readers to believe.

123

Matt Jones’ Tweet : “The same amount of oil is being produced as the Trump era.  That’s not the reason that prices have gone up.”

This discussion point is seen a lot, but this is a half-truth. Yes, the U.S. is currently producing as much oil as the final year of Trump’s presidency, but that was during the peak of the pandemic, when demand plummeted and producers shut down wells. The United States’ top 10 oil producing months all occurred during Trump’s presidency as shown in the graph below, peaking in December 2019 at 400,000,000 barrels for the month. The additional 35+ million barrels per month would greatly impact today’s oil market.

123

Twitter Name/Handle, Example 2:  Clay Travis (@ClayTravis)

Background:  Clay Travis is another lawyer turned radio host, although that might be his only similarities to Matt Jones. Clay received a law degree from Vanderbilt University, but quickly moved to a career in sports with a radio show and the founding of Outkick the Coverage. Currently, Clay is a political commentator on The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show, a conservative talk show that replaced Rush Limbaugh. His book, Dixieland Delight, is a must read for SEC football fans like myself, although his love for the low down, dirty Tennessee Volunteers is not his most redeeming trait. 

Clay Travis Twitter Page

Clay Travis’ Tweet: “Gas has officially passed $5 gallon, an all-time high that acts as a default tax to the poorest Americans, and prices show no signs of coming days any time soon. Joe Biden is the worst president in modern American history, maybe ever.”

Many Democrats simply blame Putin for the rise in oil prices, which is not accurate.  Likewise, conservatives like Clay Travis like to incorrectly place ALL of the oil price impacts on President Biden. This was recently discussed by Chris Amstutz in his blog called Shoot Me Straight: Is Biden Wrecking Energy Markets,  which discussed the numerous market fundamentals and events that have caused the strong increase in energy prices.  As Chris pointed out in the blog entry:

“The truth is, oil, natural gas, and electricity prices began rising in the summer of 2021 to now (up over 100% year over year), due to chronic underinvestment in the energy industry. COVID-19 lockdowns destroyed demand for hydrocarbons, leading to some of the biggest financial losses in the history of American petroleum. The White House now claims that these same companies are gouging Americans, ignoring the need for producers to show a financial return to investors who also lost heavily in 2020-2021. This, coupled with policies that have inhibited domestic pipeline growth and drilling, has added to the global energy shortages we see today.”

Clay Travis Tweet : “Last night’s @seanhannity hit with @GeraldoRivera debating Biden’s plan for high gas prices. Enjoy:

Video: 4:54 Mark…Sean Hannity “He (Biden) was handed energy independence…”

The term “energy independence” is used often, and is something that every U.S. presidential candidate has promised for the last 50 years (as well as stating that this is most important election of my lifetime 😊). However, the term is sort of a misnomer in that the U.S. does not have the infrastructure in place to halt imports completely from other countries and act “independent”. Pipelines, refineries, and economic/political policy have led to our current situation. The blame of high energy prices cannot and should not ever fully fall on a sitting President, due to decades of planning and building in this industry. The U.S. is a “net exporter” of petroleum, but this simply means the value of petroleum we export exceeds the value of what we import. Estimates are that the U.S. uses roughly 18.1 million oil equivalent barrels/day of petroleum, and we produced 18.4 million. How and where these barrels get used, and what part of the world they come from is a much deeper rabbit hole that cannot be condensed into a sports talk show or energy market blog.

123

Conclusion:

As these examples clearly show, two well-educated people have a hard time of getting all the facts straight when discussing energy fundamentals. It’s nearly impossible for anyone outside the industry to keep up with countless, evolving fundamentals that aren’t limited to: storage, weather, rig counts, geopolitics, frac spreads, and U.S. vs. global demand. This is exactly how GETCHOICE! assists our clients. Through market calls, white papers, and market presentations our Risk Management team ensures our clients have the market intelligence to navigate the energy landscape and make educated purchasing decisions. Contact us or your GETCHOICE! Client Advisor to find out more details about our Strategic Procurement and Risk Management services.  As for Matt Jones and Clay Travis, I don’t want to be the guy that tells them to “stick to sports” but I sure wouldn’t recommend taking their energy advice.  

Shoot Me Straight: Is Biden Wrecking Energy Markets?

By: Chris Amstutz

We regret to inform you; the politicians are back at it again. We have commented on politics in energy numerous times in the past, and today we look to address the volley of energy headlines that have come out in recent weeks. Like every topic, there is nuance and gray area that is difficult to explain to those outside the energy industry. Today we start a new blog series to address ongoing questions from popular headlines in the industry. GETCHOICE! has decades of combined energy experience, and like a cowboy in the wild west of the energy industry, we always shoot you straight. Here are some of the recent headlines with additional nuance discussed.

Will Biden’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Release Lower Gasoline Prices?

This article reports that the White House predicts gasoline prices to fall 10-30 cents per gallon on the announcement that 180 million barrels of oil would be released for U.S. consumption. SPR releases have had mixed results in the past and it is difficult to say what the final outcome for this will be. The visible outcome thus far, is that the market has lowered WTI oil price futures for the next 6 months, but increased prices beyond that point (see chart below). This is due to producers adapting their production outputs lower in the long run due to lower profit margins in the short run. So all in all, the more complicated answer is that politicians can marginally adjust oil and natural gas prices in the short run but these policies have rippling, unintended consequences in the future. Upward price movements, like what we have seen in the last 6 months, ultimately are tied to long term fundamentals of supply and demand against the back drop of industry trends.

Has the U.S. given up on the Green Energy transition?

This article discusses the “reluctance of President Biden to unleash clean energy rhetoric”. Green energy topics do not typically poll well when energy prices are high (hence the President’s reluctance), but many U.S. and European politicians believe that high prices are the catalyst to increasing renewable energy sources on the grid. The reality is that the U.S. is still not close to a macro, nationwide green future due to the sheer scale in technology required to change the current system. However, micro, individual business level green-initiatives are becoming more popular due to the ability to save money on utilities. GETCHOICE!’s utility bill management  platform GET: Smart Management Technology (formerly Choice! Data Connect), allows businesses to benchmark usage, track Scope 2 & 3 carbon emissions, and quantify savings from these green initiatives at the site level. This trend will grow due to high energy prices and the need for increased cost efficiencies.

Are Oil, Natural Gas, and Electricity Prices Increasing Because of Vladimir Putin?

The White House recently published this fact sheet, addressing “Putin’s price hike at the pump”. While it is easy and convenient to blame high energy prices on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it is but a small factor in the energy market price increase, and should not be used as a meaningful procurement strategy. The truth is, oil, natural gas, and electricity prices began rising in the summer of 2021 to now (up over 100% year over year), due to chronic underinvestment in the energy industry. COVID-19 lockdowns destroyed demand for hydrocarbons, leading to some of the biggest financial losses in the history of American petroleum. The White House now claims that these same companies are gouging Americans, ignoring the need for producers to show a financial return to investors who also lost heavily in 2020-2021. This, coupled with policies that have inhibited domestic pipeline growth and drilling, has added to the global energy shortages we see today. In all reality, Vladimir Putin likely sees the global energy shortage and lack of energy security as an opportunity to advance Russia’s interests in Ukraine, knowing that Europe has no other choice than to buy their petroleum.

The path forward for energy prices is unclear. The answer to the blog question is that President Biden has only a limited capability to affect energy prices in the short run, but the effects of policies today could shape prices two years from now. In the same right, President Biden cannot be blamed fully for today’s energy prices, which were set in to motion during the height of COVID-19. Government directed policy has a tendency to cause the opposite of what is intended in an industry as complex as energy. The facts remain that the globe has felt the effects of an energy shortage since last summer and it will likely continue to be felt for another year as the market stabilizes. The current administration has vocally opposed the use of hydrocarbons, but is quickly realizing the damaging economic effects of a world without them. GETCHOICE! continues to monitor the news closely, looking out for our client’s financial well being during these times of high energy prices.

It’s The End Of The World As We Know It

By; Chris Amstutz

We interrupt your regularly scheduled broadcast to inform you that energy markets (and everything else for that matter) are going crazy once again. What better way to convey market volatility, than through the catchy, over-dramatic song released by R.E.M. in 1987? Perhaps you glanced over our previous calls to action here, here, and here, but now the threat of war in Ukraine exacerbating already high energy prices has you reevaluating your company’s energy strategy. It may feel like the end of the world as we know it, but the consultants at Choice! have the experience and technology to enable your business to ride out these wild times. Let’s briefly dive in to how current global affairs can affect U.S. energy markets and your bottom line.

The Back Story

  • Russia has invaded Ukraine at a time in which global oil and natural gas prices have been near record highs. Petroleum exports largely fund the Russian government.
  • “Weaponization of Commodities” is the fear that Russia could cut energy exports to Europe and the U.S. causing increasing inflationary pressure and power black outs in Europe.
  • Global energy prices will be volatile with every piece of news from this conflict, and this will directly tie back to U.S. natural gas and power prices.

U.S. Pricing

  • The March NYMEX NG contract traded as high as $4.95 today on fear of the conflict in Ukraine, pulling calendar strip 2023 & 2024 up to contract highs of $4.03 and $3.49 respectively.
  • Europe and the UK have seen power and natural gas prices spike 60% today, to the highest prices on record. €342/MWh for their April contract will increase inflation across the pond.
  • Options trading for the NYMEX Henry Hub November 2022 contract (start of winter) is indicating a range of outcomes from $3.35 – $6.15/MMBtu
  • Due to Natural Gas being the main input fuel for generation, electricity prices will continue to rise nationally. Tariff rates will have a slightly lagged effect in rising, and it could be wise to lock in prices now to hedge against these volatile, uncertain times.

U.S. Supply and Demand

  • WTI Oil briefly touched $100/barrel this morning on news of the conflict. At this price level, new drilling is profitable in ALL U.S. producing regions.
  • U.S. producers could increase oil supply by 10% by the end of 2022, and natural gas supply by as much as 5%. This increase will be needed in the market and would halt rising prices.
  • While the U.S. cannot export more than the current 13 BCF/D level, upward global pressure of prices above $40/MMBtu will keep the risk premium in place for the U.S. markets. This risk premium is due to the possibility of needing to keep this supply stateside if a future shortage occurs.
  • The White House has changed tune recently, asking U.S. producers to increase oil and natural gas output to offset Russian supply globally.

In any market there are quantitative markers (pricing, supply/demand) and there are qualitative markers (trends and historical precedent). We are currently experiencing extreme volatility in the energy markets and a marriage of quantitative and qualitative analysis is needed. Choice! Energy Management is in a unique position to consult your business from an angle of qualitative experience, and from the angle of technology based quantitative analytics. This ensures that your business is able to save the maximum amount of money across the energy landscape, adding emphasis to the “and I feel fine” part of the “the end of the world as we know it” line.